The Cambridge Primary Review Trust

Search

  • Home
    • CPRT national conference
    • Blog
    • News
  • About CPRT
    • Overview
    • Mission
    • Aims
    • Priorities
    • Programmes
    • Priorities in Action
    • Organisation
    • People
      • National
    • Professional development
    • Media
  • CPR
    • Overview
    • Remit
    • Themes
    • Themes, Perspectives and Questions in Full
    • Evidence
    • People
    • CPR Publications
    • CPR Media Coverage
    • Dissemination
  • Networks
    • Overview
    • Schools Alliance
  • Research
    • Overview
    • CPRT/UoY Dialogic Teaching Project
    • Assessment
    • Children’s Voice
    • Learning
    • Equity and Disadvantage
    • Teaching
    • Sustainability and Global Understanding
    • Vulnerable children
    • Digital Futures
    • Demographic Change, Migration and Cultural Diversity
    • Systemic Reform in Primary Education
    • Alternative models of accountability and quality assurance
    • Initial Teacher Education
    • SW Research Schools Network
    • CPR Archive Project
  • CPD
  • Publications
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Enquiries
    • Regional
    • School
    • Media
    • Other Organisations

News

May 1, 2012 by CPRT

National Curriculum Review: ‘The “Expert Panel” Report, The Secretary of State’s Proposals and the CPR’

Since last December the Department for Education (DfE) has been consulting on the national curriculum report of its ʻexpert panelʼ (EP). 
A statement from the Secretary of State is expected very soon. It will launch draft proposals for the revised national curriculum for England together with draft KS1/2 programmes of study for the designated ‘core’ subjects of English, maths and science.

to continue reading this article, download the pdf

 

December 15, 2011 by CPRT

The Cambridge Primary Review Research Surveys to be available as an ebook at last

see details here

November 16, 2011 by CPRT

Prestigious book award for the CPR

Children, their World, their Education, the 600-page final report of the Cambridge Primary Review, has received First Prize in the 2011 Book Awards of the Society for Educational Studies (SES). This cash prize is awarded annually for a book which tackles issues of fundamental educational importance, displays conspicuous originality of analysis and argument, effectively connects research, theory, policy and practice, and is accessibly written.

to continue reading this article, download the full pdf

 

September 11, 2011 by CPRT

Raise the profile of oracy: Support No Pens Day

TALK REALLY MATTERS. In its chapter on pedagogy, the CPR final report highlighted classroom talk  as the point where the research evidence on children’s development, learning and effective teaching most obviously and urgently converges. We neglect talk at children’s peril, for it is one of the keys to empowering them as thinkers, learners and citizens. Yet, in their evidence to the CPR many of our witnesses complained that oracy just isn’t taken seriously enough where it matters. They told us that the current national curriculum version of ‘speaking and listening’ is weakly conceived, that it wrongly detaches oracy from literacy, and that there remains considerable political ambivalence about
whether, beyond basic communication skills, talk is really as crucial to learning as its advocates claim.

It is crucial. The evidence is clear and convincing. The CPR has therefore argued, in both its final report and its submission to the current national curriculum review, that oracy should have a much higher profile across the whole curriculum, not just in national curriculum English where it currently appears.

That’s why we support Hello, the 2011 national year of communication, and No Pens Day (28 September 2011, or another date at about that time) when children and teachers are asked to put down their pens, turn off their screens and concentrate on TALK. Will you join us in supporting Hello and the power of talk in this very tangible – and indeed audible – way? Several hundred schools have already committed themselves.

September 6, 2011 by CPRT

the CPR director’s submission to phase 2 of the DfE Professional Standards Review

DfE Review of Teachers’ Standards: Phase 2

May 25, 2011 by CPRT

Robin Alexander’s keynote at the Westminster Education Forum seminar on the primary curriculum

Priorities for a primary curriculum

May 1, 2011 by CPRT

Read the CPR’s submission to the DFE’s Teachers’ Standards Review

Review of Teachers’ Standards – Note from Professor Robin Alexander

April 14, 2011 by CPRT

Read the CPR’s submission to the National Curriculum Review

This document is the CPR’s submission to the DfE’s National Curriculum Review: Call for Evidence.

November 24, 2010 by CPRT

What next for primary education?

The Importance of Teaching: the Schools White Paper

published December 2010 by the Department for Education

  • A summary version compiled by Alison Peacock for the Cambridge Primary Review Network can be downloaded here.
  • The White Paper itself can be downloaded here

If you would like to comment on what is written in the summary then please send your feedback to Julia Flutter, juliaflutter@primaryreview.org.uk.

November 20, 2010 by CPRT

What next for primary education?

A New UKLA report on teaching reading:

PRESS RELEASE!

In its business plan, published last week, the government included the target of promoting “systematic synthetic phonics in schools” to remedy low reading scores. The government is also planning to introduce “a simple reading test” for six-year-olds to help identify those who need extra help. This is likely to be a non-word reading test.

UKLA says Phonics is not enough!
In two new publications, available at www.ukla.org, UKLA argues that both moves are unhelpful and sets out a research-informed alternative approach.

In Teaching Reading: What the evidence says (foreword by Michael Rosen), Henrietta Dombey and colleagues in the UKLA and the International Reading Association draw on abundant evidence from both sides of the Atlantic to show that what actually works in the classroom is a more comprehensive, integrated and flexible approach.

An accompanying statement gives 5 clear reasons to show why a ‘non-word reading test’ would be unproductive.

  • Download the report ‘Teaching Reading – what the evidence says’
  • Download the accompanying statement ‘Non-word reading tests’

Both publications are available in printed form from UKLA for £5.
Publication date: 19th November, 2010

United Kingdom Literacy Association, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH
http://www.ukla.org
admin@ukla.org
Tel: 0116-223-1664

« Previous Page

Contact

Cambridge Primary Review Trust - Email: administrator@cprtrust.org.uk

Copyright © 2025