The Cambridge Primary Review Trust

Search

  • Home
    • CPRT national conference
    • Blog
    • News
  • About CPRT
    • Overview
    • Mission
    • Aims
    • Priorities
    • Programmes
    • Priorities in Action
    • Organisation
    • People
      • National
    • Professional development
    • Media
  • CPR
    • Overview
    • Remit
    • Themes
    • Themes, Perspectives and Questions in Full
    • Evidence
    • People
    • CPR Publications
    • CPR Media Coverage
    • Dissemination
  • Networks
    • Overview
    • Schools Alliance
  • Research
    • Overview
    • CPRT/UoY Dialogic Teaching Project
    • Assessment
    • Children’s Voice
    • Learning
    • Equity and Disadvantage
    • Teaching
    • Sustainability and Global Understanding
    • Vulnerable children
    • Digital Futures
    • Demographic Change, Migration and Cultural Diversity
    • Systemic Reform in Primary Education
    • Alternative models of accountability and quality assurance
    • Initial Teacher Education
    • SW Research Schools Network
    • CPR Archive Project
  • CPD
  • Publications
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Enquiries
    • Regional
    • School
    • Media
    • Other Organisations

November 20, 2010 by CPRT

What next for primary education?

A New UKLA report on teaching reading:

PRESS RELEASE!

In its business plan, published last week, the government included the target of promoting “systematic synthetic phonics in schools” to remedy low reading scores. The government is also planning to introduce “a simple reading test” for six-year-olds to help identify those who need extra help. This is likely to be a non-word reading test.

UKLA says Phonics is not enough!
In two new publications, available at www.ukla.org, UKLA argues that both moves are unhelpful and sets out a research-informed alternative approach.

In Teaching Reading: What the evidence says (foreword by Michael Rosen), Henrietta Dombey and colleagues in the UKLA and the International Reading Association draw on abundant evidence from both sides of the Atlantic to show that what actually works in the classroom is a more comprehensive, integrated and flexible approach.

An accompanying statement gives 5 clear reasons to show why a ‘non-word reading test’ would be unproductive.

  • Download the report ‘Teaching Reading – what the evidence says’
  • Download the accompanying statement ‘Non-word reading tests’

Both publications are available in printed form from UKLA for £5.
Publication date: 19th November, 2010

United Kingdom Literacy Association, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH
http://www.ukla.org
admin@ukla.org
Tel: 0116-223-1664

Please read our terms of use

Contact

Cambridge Primary Review Trust - Email: administrator@cprtrust.org.uk

Copyright © 2025